Reviews for Nikon Coolpix S220 10 Megapixel Compact Camera - Plum2.5" LCD - 3x Optical Zoom - 3648 x 2736 Image - 640 x 480 Video - PictBridge - MPN: 26150 
By member:
jsmith1234123
- Sep 3, 2009
Bad Image qualityStrengths: Very compact and lightweight Weakness: Very bad image quality The image quality is absolutely unacceptable. I even thought my camera was faulty prior of reading the reviews here. The images are very soft, and there are big purple fringing in presence of high contrast. Very bad. 50% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
ExNikonOwner
- Aug 8, 2009
Why did I put up with the S220 for 8 months!Strengths: Small Size Weakness: Bad Image Quality I was so excited to find a Nikon in such a small package (I have owned 4 Nikon Coolpix cameras). But the image quality rates a ZERO. (This review did not allow that rating.) My first 2mp camera had better sharpness. When I called Nikon to complain they said to send it in for reconfiguration! When I called the store, they said to drop it and take advantage of my protection plan! 67% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
SyedMehmoodNaqvi
- Jun 28, 2009
Poor image qualityStrengths: Small size Weakness: Poor image quality I bought this camera two weeks ago. When I tried to turn it on it displayed a message "lens error". I tried several times but it didn't work. So I went to the shop and asked them to return the camera. However, they said the camera is very good and replaced with another one. However, the other camera is not good either. The image quality is very poor. I have an old HP 2.0 megapixel camera. Surprisingly, this Nikon camera doesn't show better image quality. The movie in bright sun also introduces noise in the frames. Overall it is not worth buying. 67% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
ev1l_m0nty_burns
- May 31, 2009
Poor image qualityStrengths: Small size, LCD size Weakness: Image quality Poor image quality outweighs the good qualities of this camera. 93% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
testseek.com - Feb 20, 2012
Nikon Coolpix S220
Testseek.com has collected 22 expert reviews for Nikon Coolpix S220 and the average expert rating is 74 of 100. The average score reflects the expert community’s view on this product. Click below and use Testseek.com to see all ratings, product awards and conclusions. Top
productwiki.com - Jun 10, 2010
Nikon Coolpix S220 | Purple
The Nikon Coolpix S220 is the base model in Nikons Coolpix Style series, which is a line of sophisticated and stylish digital cameras. This is a slim ultra-compact camera that has advanced shooting functions and a 10 megapixel resolution for accurate reproduction of fine details. The 3x zoom NIKKOR lens covers focal lengths from 35-105 mm thanks to six aspherical surfaces. Nikon’s Smart... Top
reviewgist.com - Jan 2, 2010
Best Ultra-Compact Digital Camera with Price Under $1000
Image is Good according to 13 Digital Camera experts. -- "beautiful picture"-steves-digicams.com -- "best photo results"-reviews.cnet.com -- "stunning color and sharpness"-steves-digicams.com Read more to find expert opinions on more features like Video, Optics, Interface, Battery, etc. Top
cnet.com - Jul 10, 2009
Nikon CoolPix S220 (plum)
THE GOOD: Great design; very compact; well priced; very good features for its class. THE BAD: Mediocre photo quality; slow performance. THE BOTTOM LINE: The Nikon Coolpix S220 is an adequate, inexpensive choice for social network-loving photographers. Top
|
|
 |
|
BAD. IMAGE. QUALITY.
Strengths: there is nothing good about this camera.
Weakness: everything. the images when you upload them on your computer or print them out.
When I went to walmart today, I was complaining about how the pictures were so blurry and disgusting. I demand a new camera. I really don't like this camera. YOU SHOULD NOT GET THIS CAMERA AND I AM TELLING YOU RIGHT NOW. This camera is really bad and you should believe me. This camera is BAD. It was HORRIBLE quality. that is all.
100% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?